SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens): Ultimate Practical Review Guide

This guide provides a comprehensive overview for understanding and reviewing a Simple Agreement for Future Tokens (SAFT). It is designed for both investors and issuing companies to navigate the complexities of SAFTs effectively. Key aspects covered in this guide include:

  1. What is a Simple Agreement for Future Tokens (SAFT) and Why?
  2. Step-by-step guide to review a SAFT

What Is a Simple Agreement for Future Tokens (SAFT) and Why?

Simple Agreement for Future Tokens (SAFT) is a legal instrument designed to facilitate the investment process in a crypto project before the tokens are fully developed and functional. This agreement operates under the premise that the tokens will be issued to investors at a later stage, typically when the project reaches a certain level of maturity or a specific milestone.

Key Advantage of SAFTs including:

  • It is tailored for crypto industry: SAFTs are designed specifically for the crypto industry, catering to investors' preference for token-based exits.
  • You can raise money faster: SAFTs speed up the fundraising process. SAFTs facilitate quick capital raise, essential for keeping pace with the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency market.
  • Non-Dilutive Financing: Utilizing SAFTs for funding avoids dilution of existing shareholders' equity, maintaining the company's current ownership and control intact. It is also much faster compared to traditional equity funding.

The SAFT is an adaptation of the SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity) protocol, originally invented by Y Combinator (YC). The SAFE model, crafted for conventional startups, was re-envisioned into the SAFT. Alongside the SAFT, the crypto sector often employs another popular financing method, the SAFE+Token Warrant. This approach merges the traditional SAFE agreement with a warrant for future token purchases under certain conditions. Both SAFT and SAFE+Token Warrant represent the most mainstream methods of financing in the realm of crypto enterprises

Step-by-step guide to review a SAFT

Step 1: Ensure Precise Definition of Tokens

The first crucial step is to ensure that the concept of the token is precisely defined.

  1. Identification of Exact Token Type: Crypto projects sometimes have more than one type of token. The SAFT must clearly state which specific token it's about. This is essential to avoid future disputes and misunderstandings. Companies need the definition of the token in the SAFT to be as specific and clear as possible. Conversely, the investor might favor a broader definition of the token in the SAFT.
  2. Scope Limitation to the Targeted Project: Crypto entrepreneurs sometimes run multiple projects. A well-structured SAFT must explicitly limit its scope to the tokens of the specific project in question, clearly delineating its applicability and avoiding unintentional extension to other ventures of the entrepreneur. Companies typically aim to limit the SAFT's scope to a single project to prevent overextension of their obligations. In contrast, investors might prefer a broader scope to include potential future projects and tokens.
👉 Good Practices (Pro-SAFT investors): **“*Token(s)*” means** any network cryptocurrency, decentralized application tokens, protocol tokens, blockchain-based assets or other cryptofinance coins, tokens or similar digital assets created and issued in connection with the Project that is a governance token of the Project, provided that the Tokens will not include any Tokens issued or used solely for development, testing or experimental purposes. **** ***Pro Rata Rights*.**  The Investor shall have the right to purchase its pro rata share of any Tokens sold by the Company (or other tokens sold by Company) at any time after the date hereof and on or before the Token Delivery Date (the “*Pro Rata Right*”).  Pro rata share for purposes of this Pro Rata Right is the ratio of (x) the number of Tokens issued or issuable to the Investor pursuant to the SAFT to (y) the Total Token Supply as of immediately before the occurrence of such Token sale or the Token Delivery Date, as applicable.  The Pro Rata Right described above shall automatically terminate upon the Token Delivery Date.

Step 2: Review the definition of “Token Issuer”

A key consideration is to accurately understand and differentiate between the token issuer (which could be a foundation, trust, or DAO, etc.) and the signatory of the SAFT agreement. This distinction is crucial because, in the early stages of a crypto project, the entity signing the SAFT might not be the same entity that will ultimately issue the tokens.

  • For SAFT Investors: From an investor's perspective, more favorable terms would be those that require a clear identification of the ultimate token issuer and ensure a definite legal and liability connection between them and the SAFT signatory. For example, if a foundation signs the SAFT but another entity issues the tokens, investors should demand a clause ensuring that the foundation is obligated to ensure the delivery of tokens or provide equivalent compensation.
  • For the SAFT Company: For the project side, more favorable terms might include more flexible definitions, allowing for the adjustment of the token-issuing entity in response to regulatory changes without breaching the SAFT agreement. This would enable the adaptation of the issuing entity to regulatory shifts without violating the agreement, while ensuring that such terms do not compromise investor rights.
👉 Good Practice (Pro-SAFT investors): **“*Token Issuer*” means the Company; the Company’s present and future parents, subsidiaries and Affiliates and their respective successors and assigns; the present and future Key Team Members; and any foundation or similar entity that issues, distributes, creates, generates, mints or produces Tokens and is related to the Company, or its present or future parents or subsidiaries with respect to software code developed by the Company, or by any of the Company’s present and future parents, subsidiaries and Affiliates.**

Step 3: Reviewing Token Launch Deadline Clauses

The token launch deadline in a Simple Agreement for Future Tokens (SAFT) refers to the specified date by which the project's network must be launched and tokens are to be issued to the purchasers. This deadline is significant as it protects the purchaser by providing a clear timeframe for the project's delivery. Without a specified deadline, the agreement may resemble an indefinite, interest-free loan from the purchaser to the company, which can be risky for investors. The consequences of not meeting the deadline vary, including potential refunds or write-offs, as seen in cases like the Telegram token sale.

  • For SAFT Investors: From an investor's perspective, more favorable terms would be the inclusion of a specific deadline date for the network launch, along with clear, enforceable consequences if the network is not launched by that date (we recommend all or partial refund).
  • For the SAFT Company: For the company or token issuer, more favorable terms would involve either not having a deadline date for the network launch or having a more flexible timeline. This allows for adjustments and unforeseen delays in the project development without facing immediate legal or financial consequences.
👉 **Good Practice (Pro-SAFT investors):**

This Agreement shall be terminated:

  1. by mutual written consent of the Parties;
  2. by the Buyer (without relieving the Vendor of any obligations arising from a prior breach of or non-compliance with this Agreement) if the Token Launch does not occur within [] years following the Effective Date, or a longer period as agreed by the Parties in writing (the “Deadline”);
  3. by the Vendor pursuant to this Agreement.

For the avoidance of doubt, if this Agreement is terminated, the Vendor shall immediately refund the Buyer an amount equivalent to the Buyer’s Purchase Consideration minus necessary expenses within seven (7) days.

Step 4: Reviewing the Refund clause

Refund in a Simple Agreement for Future Tokens (SAFT) are critical clauses that outline the conditions under which investors can receive their funds back. These conditions typically include scenarios such as the network not launching by a specified deadline, dissolution events affecting the company, or cancellation rights within the agreement.

  • For SAFT Investors: From an investor's perspective, favorable terms would include a clear entitlement to a full refund of the purchase amount in scenarios like project non-delivery by the deadline, company dissolution, or SAFT cancellation. Investors would benefit from minimal deductions from the refund for company-incurred expenses, ensuring a substantial recovery of their investment.
  • For the SAFT Company: For the company, it is better to not have such clause. If must, more favorable terms might involve specifying conditions under which refunds are due and clearly defining allowable deductions from the refund amount for expenses incurred. This can include development costs, operational expenses, or legal fees. The company might also seek to include clauses that limit refund obligations under certain conditions, like unforeseen regulatory changes, to protect against extensive financial liabilities.
👉 **Good Practice (Pro-SAFT Company, if you have to include a refund clause):** **Refund of Purchase Amount.** Upon 30 days after a Dissolution Event, the Company will, after the payment of all other creditors, refund to the Purchaser an amount equal to One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Purchase Amount, net of applicable taxes and expenses associated with the SAFT Offering (such amount, the “**Returned Purchase Amount**”) to the extent funds are lawfully available. For the avoidance of doubt, funds from the business operations of the Company other than funds received in this SAFT Offering shall not be available for payment of Returned Purchase Amount. The Purchaser acknowledges that there may be circumstances in which the Company will not be able to refund all or a portion of the Purchase Amount to Purchaser.

Step 5: Review clauses related to the Amount of Tokens

The amount of tokens define how many tokens the investor is entitled to receive. You must ensure that the SAFT clearly outlines either a specific number of tokens to be allocated to the purchaser or a detailed mechanism for calculating this number.

  • For SAFT Investors: Investors would benefit from terms that clearly state either a specific number of tokens to be received or a transparent mechanism for calculating this number. A fixed number provides certainty, while a formula based on future events (like subsequent financing rounds) could potentially offer benefits tied to the project's success. However, investors should be aware of how their token allocation compares to their equity stake in traditional terms.
  • For the SAFT Company: From the company's perspective, favorable terms might include flexibility in determining the token quantity, especially if tied to future valuations or financing rounds. This allows the company to adapt to changing circumstances and market conditions. However, it's important to balance this flexibility with clear, understandable formulas to maintain investor confidence.

Step 6: Review clauses related to the Token Price

The token price provision in a SAFT determines the cost per token that the investor will pay. This can be set as a fixed price or a variable price. A fixed price offers certainty, but may not account for market fluctuations. A variable price, meanwhile, adjusts according to certain future events or market conditions, potentially providing more fairness in rapidly changing markets.

  • For SAFT Investors: Investors typically benefit from a variable token price, especially if it includes a right to purchase tokens at a discount in future pricing events. This approach can protect investors from market downturns and ensure that they do not overpay if the token's value decreases by the time it is issued.
  • For the SAFT Company: For the company, a fixed token price can be advantageous, particularly if they can set it during favorable market conditions. This provides the company with a predictable amount of funding. However, a variable price can also be beneficial as it may attract more investors during uncertain market periods by offering the potential for more equitable pricing.

Step 7: Review CancellationProvisions

Cancellation provisions often outline the conditions under which either party can terminate the agreement. This may include failure to launch the network by a deadline, failure to raise a specified amount of funds, or other predetermined events. Understanding these provisions is crucial as they dictate the circumstances under which the SAFT can be nullified and what happens to the funds already invested.

  • For SAFT Investors: From an investor's perspective, favorable terms would be those that allow cancellation if the project fails to meet key milestones, such as the network launch by a specified date or achieving certain funding goals. Investors would benefit from terms that ensure a full or substantial refund of their investment in case of cancellation.
  • For the SAFT Company: For the company, more favorable terms might include the right to cancel the SAFT under specific conditions, such as drastic market changes or regulatory challenges, with the option to return the purchase amount to the investor. This can protect the company from being locked into an unfeasible project or facing legal challenges. However, to maintain investor confidence, such terms should be balanced and fair.

Step 8: Reviewing Resale Restrictions

Resale provisions in a SAFT refer to the clauses that restrict or regulate the ability of purchasers to resell their tokens or assign their rights under the SAFT in the secondary market, especially before the network launch. These provisions are essential because they directly impact the liquidity of the investment and compliance with regulatory frameworks. Resale restrictions are significant for maintaining control over the token distribution and ensuring regulatory compliance, such as under Reg D or Reg S in the United States. For the company, it prevents premature circulation of tokens in the market, which can affect token economics and market stability. For investors, these restrictions impact their ability to liquidate their investment before the network is operational.

  • For SAFT Investors: Investors would prefer terms that allow some flexibility in resale, possibly after a certain period or under specific conditions. This flexibility can provide them with an opportunity to liquidate their investment if needed, even before the network launch, while still respecting the company's need to maintain control over the token distribution.
  • For the SAFT Company: For the company, more favorable terms would involve stricter resale restrictions, particularly until the network launch. This allows the company to control the token economy and manage regulatory risks effectively. The company might also prefer a longer lock-up period post-launch to ensure market stability.

Step 9: Review Lockup and Delivery Schedule

Lockup and delivery schedule dictate the timeframe during which investors are restricted from selling their tokens after the network launch or public listing. This period often ranges from 12 to 48 months and is crucial for stabilizing the market post-launch. Additionally, these provisions detail when and how tokens are delivered to investors.

  • For SAFT Investors: Favorable terms for investors would typically include shorter lockup periods for earlier liquidity, and clarity on token delivery. The option to stake tokens during the lockup for additional rewards is also advantageous, offering a return on investment despite the selling restriction.
  • For the SAFT Company: For companies, longer lockup periods are generally preferable, as they allow the network and token market to mature and stabilize before significant selling occurs. Additionally, companies might favor provisions that give them some discretion to modify the lockup period. This flexibility can be crucial in adapting to changing market conditions or regulatory landscapes.
👉 **Good Practice (Pro-Company):**

Token Unlocking Schedule: during the period commencing from the expiration of [<>] months following the Token Launch until the expiration of [<>] months following the Token Launch, the total number of the Buyer Tokens will unlock on a [] basis.

The foregoing schedule may be modified by the Vendor at its sole discretion in connection with any listing, partnership, co-operation or participation in connection with a major digital asset exchange.

For the avoidance of doubt, unless unlocked, the Buyer shall not engage in and/or cause any transactions that will or may result in the transfer of, use and/or disposal of, and/or cause the sale and/or disposal of any part of the Buyer Tokens that has not been unlocked.

Step 10: Most Favored Nation Clauses in a SAFT

The Most Favored Nation (MFN) clause in SAFTs is designed to ensure that an investor receives no less favorable terms than any other investor in subsequent financing rounds. If the company offers more advantageous terms in later-issued SAFTs to new investors, the MFN clause allows the original investor to amend their SAFT to match these more favorable terms. An MFN clause is a significant protection for investors. It ensures that early investors are not disadvantaged compared to later investors, which is particularly important in the dynamic and rapidly evolving landscape of token financing.

  • For SAFT Investors: For investors, an MFN clause is highly beneficial. It guarantees that they can access any more favorable terms that the company may offer to subsequent investors. This might include better pricing, more favorable token distribution schedules, or lower risk terms.
  • For the SAFT Company: From the company's perspective, including an MFN clause can be a double-edged sword. While it can attract early investors by offering them assurance of fair treatment, it also means the company must carefully consider any improved terms it offers in subsequent rounds, as these terms will be extended to earlier investors. The company should balance the need to attract new investors with the obligations to existing ones.
👉 **Good Practice (Pro-Investor):** **“MFN” Amendment Provision.** The Vendor may offer and sell SAFTs or similar outstanding warrants to purchase Tokens to any Person, or grant such warrants or Tokens to management team member of the Vendor and/or the Project (including any outside advisors, consultants, counsels and officers) in multiple rounds at different times and on different terms (“Subsequent Offerings”). If the Vendor enters into any arrangement regarding Subsequent Offerings, the Vendor will promptly provide the Buyer with written notice thereof, together with any information related to such Subsequent Offerings as may be reasonably requested by the Buyer. In the event the Buyer determines that the terms and/or conditions granted to any Person under the Subsequent Offerings are preferable to the terms and/or conditions of this Agreement, the Buyer will notify the Vendor in writing. Promptly after receipt of such written notice from the Buyer, the Vendor agrees to amend and restate this Agreement to be identical to the instrument(s) evidencing the Subsequent Offerings.